Cycle Time Optimization
STR will come to your site, or simply provide the guidance, to help you get the most out of your laminators. STR can provide "starter" cycles that have been proven effective, but because lamination equipment varies
depending on manufacturer, age, or materials used, the only way to get the most out of your process is to go through an optimization exercise. This is an iterative process requiring a time and materials commitment, but the productivity gains in the end usually far outweigh the initial costs.
Step one is to map out your current process. We're looking to see how long it takes to reach a full vacuum or what temperature the EVA is at during various stages. When optimizing a cycle it is important to capture the temperature between the encapsulant sheets and behind the cells.
Minimize the Evacuation
Once the temperature of the module has come up enough to melt the encapsulant (for EVA it's 62°C) it's safe to apply the press—as long as all the air has been evacuated. For most systems a three to four minute evacuation is adequate. Because the modules bow away from the platen, very little heat gets transferred to the encapsulant during this stage. Thus the single easiest way to trim time off a lamination cycle is to work to get the press on as quickly as possible.
Look for small "champagne" bubbles near the edges of the module. These can be an indication that the evacuation wasn't long enough or the EVA had melted too much before full vacuum was reached.
|
Maximize the Temerature
STR's exclusive User-Friendly (UF) process removes most of the stress inherent in an extrusion process before the material reaches our customer's plants, resulting in negligible shrinkage of the encapsulant. This allows for much higher lamination temperatures (and shorter cycle times) without fear of cell shifting or voids within the laminate. We recommend starting at 150°C and increasing in 5 degree increments up to 165 or 170°C. Look for bubbles along the ribbon—a sign that too much flux is present or a different flux with lower residuals may be needed.
|
Testing for Gel Content
STR strongly recommends the use of gel content testing in order to establish that sufficient cure levels have been reached. We suggest a target of 75%. This testing is important not only in the initial development of a lamination cycle, but for continued monitoring as well to ensure that the process does not drift. An insufficiently cured module may experience cell movement, delamination, or current leakage during wet hi-potential testing.
STR suggests using a four minute evacuation and eight minute press at 150°C as a starting point. This cycle has consistently resulted in gel content values close to or exceeding 80%. From here higher temperatures or reduced evacuation times can result in cycles approaching eight minutes total.
STR recognizes that the long testing time and hazardous solvents involved in gel content testing can be problematic. We have now developed a way of using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) testing to determine gel content levels.
The DSC method shows excellent correlation to the well established solvent soak method and yields results in 30 minutes instead of 24 hours. STR continues to recommend that the solvent soak method be used to establish the initial lamination process and correlation to the DSC method. We are happy to provide this as a service to our customers, eliminating the need to construct a wet laboratory or go through the time and expense of sending gel content samples to an outside lab. Once a customer has purchased their own DSC STR can also provide any methods and training needed.
How STR Can Help
This case study shows actual data and cycle times generated by STR at one of our customer’s sites. They use a large belt fed laminator from a prominent European manufacturer and their standard process was developed around using a competitor’s encapsulant.
As the graph to the right demonstrates, the encapsulant temperature does not always match the platen settings, and some laminators operate more efficiently at higher temperatures. Knowing that shrinkage would not be a problem with our encapsulant, we began building a cycle around the 154° set point.
| |
Initial Cycle |
Test with STR |
| Laminator set point |
144° |
154° |
| Evacuation with pins |
2.5 minutes |
0 minutes |
| Evacuation without pins |
2 minutes |
3 minutes |
| Press |
13.5 minutes |
11 minutes |
|
|
Initial panels produced at 154° resulted in small bubbles at the edges of the module. After trying to increase the evacuation time without success, we were able to solve the problem by using the pins for 30 seconds, allowing the pump time to evacuate the chamber before the encapsulant melted. Gel content testing showed that the 11 minute press was over-kill and this was further optimized, resulting in the cycle to the right.
|
| |
Final Cycle |
| Laminator set point |
154° |
| Evacuation with pins |
0.5 minutes |
| Evacuation without pins |
2.5 minutes |
| Press |
7 minutes |
|
|
The end result is that STR was able to achieve defect free modules with gel content values comfortably above 75% all while reducing our customer’s cycle time from 18 minutes to 10. Contact us to find out how we can help you too.